Fintegrity

Compliance work is product work.

Compliance infrastructure for modern financial products.

The problem

Transaction monitoring generates alerts far faster than teams can resolve them, and most case tooling optimises for record-keeping rather than for the analyst making a decision.

The thesis

If an alert queue is a product surface, it deserves the same design attention as onboarding.

Monitoring rulesAlert triageCase managementAudit trailReportingEscalation

Product thinking

Problem

Operational load grows faster than transaction volume in most scaling fintechs.

User

Compliance analysts, MLROs and the product teams who create their workload.

Hypothesis

Better context per alert reduces resolution time more than better rules reduce alert count.

Constraints

Auditability is non-negotiable; nothing can be silently mutated.

Prioritisation

Case context first, automation second.

Architecture

Event-sourced case history with a decision-support layer on top.

What I learned

Analysts do not want fewer screens. They want the same screen to answer the next question.

Every automation proposal eventually became a question about who signs off.

A product metric worth tracking: cases closed per analyst hour, without a fall in decision quality.